KANZI
EA
Prospectivity

cu-v3.2

Sediment-hosted copper, Kalahari Copperbelt

All runs Ranks ground
Mineral system
Cu Copper Definition 2.1
Sediment-hosted copper, Kalahari Copperbelt
Signed by T. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat on 04 Aug 2026
Gradient-boosted trees, redox-constrained · 250 m
Ran 08 Sept 2026, 272 min
Run by: Amini modelling team · Accepted by: T. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat
Supersedes cu-v3.1
Capture efficiency
0%25%50%75%100%0%25%50%75%100%randomBlind-site hit rate 1.00

The top 10% of ranked ground holds 79% of the known deposits.

Search-space reduction 95.8%

The share of the modelled area a competent person can set aside for this commodity.

Validation
Blind-site hit rate 100%
Threshold agreed at MS1 70%
Block cross-validation 6 folds, 40 km blocks
AUC 0.87 ± 0.04
Physical constraints
  • Prediction is confined to the D'Kar / Ngwako Pan redox contact and its permissible stratigraphy; ground outside it cannot score high regardless of geophysical response.
  • Cover thicker than 120 m caps the class at medium: the evidence beneath is not resolved.
  • Structural blocks north of the Ghanzi ridge are excluded pending the revised stratigraphic model.
Features and importance
FeatureCritical processSystem roleImportance
Distance to interpreted redox contactTrap: reduced host against oxidised red-bed source rockTrap
31%
Magnetic low, graben marginTransport: basin-margin faults route brine to the contactTransport
19%
Cu-Ag-Co pathfinder residualSource and transport: leakage of metal-bearing brine to surfaceTransport
17%
Red-bed thickness, modelledSource: oxidised sediment supplying copper to solutionSource
14%
Kalahari cover thicknessPreservation and detectability: cover attenuates every surface proxyPreservation
11%
Tilt-derivative structural densityTransport: fracture permeability at the contactTransport
8%
Inputs
DatasetVersionConfidence filterCoverage
Ghanzi aeromagnetics2004 levelled, 2026 re-gridA and B only94%
National gravity2021A and B only71%
KCB regional soil geochemistry2019B or better, levelled38%
Geology 1:250k with Pre-Kalahari interpretation2023all, lineage recorded100%
Boseto drilling, petrophysical calibration2024 batchassayed intervals only12%

Boseto drilling, petrophysical calibration covers 12% of the modelled area and is the layer that governs the bounds.

Validation
Withheld siteWithheld byClassIn the high class
BS-CU-01 Zone 5 extensionT. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat High In the high class
BS-CU-02 Boseto westT. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat High In the high class
BS-CU-03 Ghanzi ridge southT. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat High In the high class
BS-CU-04 MahumoT. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat High In the high class
BS-CU-05 PlutusT. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat High In the high class
BS-CU-06 Banana Zone northT. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat High In the high class
Outputs
  • Prospectivity surface 3.2 · COG, 250 m
  • Confidence surface 3.2 · COG, 250 m
  • Feature-importance maps 3.2 · COG per feature
  • Against historical exploration 3.2 · COG, 250 m
  • Difference against cu-v3.1 3.2 · COG, 250 m

Parameters

learningRate
0.05
maxDepth
5
trees
900
classCut
high ≥ 0.78, medium ≥ 0.52
negatives
3:1, drawn outside permissible stratigraphy
Limitations and completeness
  • Gravity coverage is 71% of the modelled area; the north-west gap widens the bounds there.
  • Soil geochemistry covers 38% of the belt, all of it south of the Ghanzi ridge.
  • Petrophysical calibration rests on one drilling campaign.
Against the previous edition
cu-v3.1cu-v3.2Change
Blind-site hit rate83.3%100%+16.7% Improved
Capture at 10% of area68%79%+11% Improved
Block-CV AUC0.830.87+0.04 Improved
AUC spread across folds0.060.04-0.02 Improved
High-class ground7,980 km²6,240 km²-1,740 km² Improved
Search-space reduction94.6%95.8%+1.2% Improved
Grid resolution2502500 Unchanged

Inputs that arrived

  • Boseto drilling, petrophysical calibration · 2024 batch

Inputs revised

  • Ghanzi aeromagnetics: 2004 levelled → 2004 levelled, 2026 re-grid

What moved the model

  • Tilt-derivative structural density 0% → 8%
  • Magnetic low, graben margin 24% → 19%
  • Cu-Ag-Co pathfinder residual 20% → 17%
  • Distance to interpreted redox contact 29% → 31%
  • Kalahari cover thickness 12% → 11%
  • Red-bed thickness, modelled 15% → 14%

Difference against cu-v3.1 COG, 250 m

Targets from this run

3 targets are ranked from this run.

TargetScoreClassCompetent person
KCB-CU-014 Ngwako Pan West0.91 High T. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat
KCB-CU-021 Boseto South Extension0.87 High T. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat
KCB-CU-033 Ghanzi Ridge Central0.58 Medium T. Kgosi, Pr.Sci.Nat